ICObench Has Basically Become a Parody of Itself

A few days after we posted our ICO Review of eInc on April 23, 2018, the project postponed its ICO and removed its whitepaper from the website (which we had discovered was 79% plagiarized from the original whitepaper for Ethereum).They posted a new whitepaper on May 1, 2018, and changed some tag lines on their website, but everything else is still the same - the entire team still consists of the same three founders and seven (yes, we said seven) top-rated ICObench experts as advisors. All the near-perfect ratings from before are still there.The fact that none of the seven advisors bothered to check the whitepaper in the first instance is bad enough. But to then permit (and possibly even encourage) the founding team to “rewrite history“ by posting a new whitepaper as if the first plagiarized one never existed? And not say anything about it? WTF?!? Why are any of these seven advisors even still attaching their name to the project (and that was a rhetorical question, because we all know the answer is $$$).ICObench has become a joke (and a not very funny one at that)… :/ via /r/icocrypto https://ift.tt/2GUlk3i