If ICObench experts are such good advisors, why did a project with seven of them just need to reschedule its public ICO for the third time?!?

The real tragedy here is that even after EtherInc was caught red-handed with a whitepaper that was nearly a carbon copy of the original Ethereum whitepaper, and then having to reschedule it’s ICO for the third time, there are still people in the ICO support services industry–including all the advisors still on the project–who are willing to continue supporting and promoting it. Apparently shame is an even rarer commodity than original whitepaper content over at eInc (or EtherInc , or whatever).ICO Update: EtherInc (aka eInc) or “Can we get a do over?”DISCLAIMERTokenicide is a collaborative blog written by a group of individuals. It does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. The views and opinions expressed on Tokenicide belong to its owners who write exclusively for their own purposes. The owners and contributors will never receive compensation in any way from Tokenicide. via /r/icocrypto https://ift.tt/2tFou7j